TYPES OF CASES WE TAKE:

Examples of types of cases we pursue include and
cases where someone has been harmed in some
way by criminal behavior, breaking regulations, or
unsafe behavior.  

Typically this will include a person's job or work
breaking the law or a well known safety rule which
puts their employee or others in harms way;
corporations or companies who break regulations,
laws,  and do not follow rules which leads to harm;
commercial trucks and 18 wheelers committing
crimes and traffic violations; these and various other
high risk and illegal behavior  which usually boils
down to someone breaking a law or a well known
safety rule that ends up causing death or injury to an
unsuspecting person or a person who did not
deserve to be placed in the situation they ended up
in.   Courts, insurance companies, and big business
tend to label this as negligence, or torts.  I label it as
criminal behavior.  Its the objective of the
wrongdoers to hide their crimes in the dark.  Its my
objective to bring the crime into the light, for all to
see, and to send a message to the community that
this type behavior is not tolerated where families
(parents, children, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters,
grandparents, grandchildren) are put in dangers
where they live, work, and travel through.  

I represent people who the insurance companies
like to say have been involved in "automobile
accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle accidents,
auto accident with a pedestrian, traffic accident with
a bicycle, negligent slip and falls, dangerous and
well known dog bite incidents, and other premises
liability incidents".  These are buzz words that
insurers and others who want to get away with
breaking laws use in order to minimize what they
have done.  Its terminology they use to try and
convince the public (and therefor juries) that there is
no need to try and deter or punish such behavior.

Insurers, big business, and others who wish to
avoid responsibility for behavior they choose to do
which results in harm try to convince others that
since the result (death, personal injury, and harm)
was not intended, then nobody should have to pay
anybody for anything that was a result; including
them wishing to avoid responsibility for death,
hospital bills, emergency care, surgery, medical
bills, therapy, care from a chiropractor, visits to your
general practitioner, ambulance rides, lost income,
lost earning capacity for those who are self
employed, property damage to the vehicles involved,
towing, rental bills, diminished value of the auto or
vehicle, or anything else that was a result of their
"choice" to break a law, regulation, or rule that
caused harm and personal injury to others.   

I do not like the term "accident" or "incident".  I call
them "wrecks", "collisions", "crashes",  "impacts",
"choices", and "attacks".  This puts the event into its
true light.  Someone "chooses" to talk on their
cellphone and drive.  Someone "chooses" to not pay
attention to their driving.  Someone "chooses" to try
and beat the red light.  Someone "chooses" to allow
a small child to play near their pit bull that just had
puppies.  Someone "chooses" to leave their gate
open or their fence in such bad condition that their
animal can get loose and cause injury to others.  
Someone "chooses" to not follow safety regulations,
when they knew the regulations were meant to keep
people safe.  Someone "chooses" to speed,
"chooses" to not get enough sleep before operating
a several ton vehicle, "chooses" to mess with their
radio while in heavy traffic.  All injury and death
cases we represent ultimately boil down to
someone making a choice.  That choice is to break
a law, break a safety regulation, or choice to engage
in behavior that they know will eventually kill or hurt
someone but they play Russian Roulette with
everyone else in the community so they can make a
dollar, save some of their precious time, or just act
out aggressively towards others due to some issue
they are having.